Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert M.'s avatar

Middle-Range Baby Boomer here (67, born in 1956). I agree with much of your vindictive against Baby Boomers, but I I think you need to refine your "generational needle" a little. My father was born in 1928 (a "Silent") so he was 17 and just on the cusp of adulthood when WWII ended in 1945. 1945--1970 are considered the "Golden--once in a thousand years-Period" in the US. So all his 20s and 30s were bathed in glorious United States 1950s/1960s economic development and opportunity. However for me--in the last year of the boom period--1969--I was 13 years old!

My father was a nice and outstanding man, and contributed greatly to his family and society, but I think in being born in 1928 he was born the best possible year in US history. After 1928 each successive year the opportunities in the US decreased. So the "Early Boomers" were a little worse off than the "Silents"; the "Late Boomers" a little worse off than the "Early Boomers." And each successive generation was increasingly worse off--"Generation X"; "Millennials"; "Z-ers"; Alphas . . . The Baby Boomers don't hold all the blame. The "Silents" and "The Greatest Generation" hold some too.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

And unfortunately, the way my generation (Elder Millennials, born in the 1980s) is going, it looks like the apple really isn't falling too far from the tree. SMH.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts